The New York Knicks kept their playoff hopes alive with a convincing 111-94 win over the Indiana Pacers in Game 5 of the Eastern Conference Finals. Though they still trail the series 3-2, the team demonstrated clear signs of life and potential for a comeback. With a six-point aggregate advantage through five games, New York has shown it can go toe-to-toe with Indiana in what has been a tightly contested series.
The Pacers remain in a favorable position, needing only one more win to secure a trip to the NBA Finals. However, Game 5 exposed a variety of tactical edges that the Knicks can continue to exploit. If New York can sustain this level of performance and intensity, there is a path forward.
One of the most crucial elements of the Knicks’ Game 5 success was their defensive effort. After a disappointing showing in Game 4, New York displayed significantly improved communication, discipline, and physicality. Their defensive rating in Game 5 was 96.9 points per 100 possessions, a figure rarely posted against Indiana’s high-octane offense. This marked a drastic improvement and signaled the team’s commitment to making adjustments.
New York’s perimeter defense was particularly effective. Jalen Brunson, often targeted in previous games, held his ground well. With help rotations from teammates like OG Anunoby and Mikal Bridges, the Knicks were able to contain drives and force tough shots. One key possession showed Brunson holding position on Pascal Siakam, followed by a double-team from Anunoby and a rotation from Bridges, culminating in a forced miss. Plays like that were instrumental in slowing down Indiana’s rhythm.
The Knicks also succeeded in disrupting Indiana’s transition game. The Pacers scored 16 fast-break points, but that number was deceptive. In the first half, the Knicks limited their opponent to a transition frequency of just 8.9 percent, one of Indiana’s lowest rates all season. Full-court pressure and strategic traps forced Indiana to operate in a more static half-court setting, reducing their usual offensive fluidity.
Tyrese Haliburton, a major factor in Indiana’s success, struggled mightily in Game 5. His usage rate dropped to just 12.9 percent, and he failed to score until midway through the third quarter. New York’s aggressive defense limited his involvement and effectiveness, drastically lowering Indiana’s offensive ceiling.
Offensively, New York didn’t rely heavily on shooting efficiency to dominate. Despite hitting only 8-of-29 from beyond the arc and missing seven free throws, they controlled the game through rebounding, physical play, and ball control. The Knicks finished with a plus-15 advantage in field goal attempts, driven by their dominance on the offensive boards and their ability to limit turnovers. These hustle stats were decisive in tilting the game in their favor.
Karl-Anthony Towns played a critical role in anchoring the Knicks’ offense. Despite moments of foul trouble and occasional turnovers, he remained a dominant force in the post and off the dribble. Scoring 24 points on 50 percent shooting, grabbing 13 rebounds, and dishing out three assists, Towns made his presence felt in every facet of the game. His ability to drive from the middle of the floor has become a consistent source of offense for New York. He’s averaging 25.4 points and 11.8 rebounds in the series with shooting splits of 51.8 percent from the field, 42.3 percent from deep, and 81.1 percent from the free throw line.
Indiana attempted several adjustments to slow Towns down, including switching defenders and doubling him in the post. None were particularly effective. His efficiency on drives (1.23 points per chance) continues to pressure Indiana’s frontcourt, especially when matched up against players like Siakam or Turner. Even when the Pacers tried to run the floor quickly to exploit Towns’s positioning after offensive plays, the advantage was short-lived.
Jalen Brunson also delivered a high-impact performance, scoring 32 points on just 18 shots. His early offensive success, particularly cutting off the ball and hitting tough mid-range jumpers, set the tone. Brunson’s ability to initiate offense and create separation has made him a reliable focal point for the Knicks. The Pacers had difficulty containing him, especially with Aaron Nesmith limited by an ankle injury.
Other contributors played their roles effectively. Josh Hart, despite occasional lapses, provided hustle plays and rebounding. Bridges added defensive pressure and occasional post offense. Anunoby’s versatility allowed New York to keep Indiana’s guards in check, particularly Andrew Nembhard. Mitchell Robinson added his usual physical presence, helping limit second-chance opportunities and switching onto guards when necessary.
New York’s success in Game 5 was built on foundational elements that can be replicated. Defensive rebounding, low turnover counts, and physical interior play give them a roadmap to stay competitive. These elements don’t rely on unsustainable hot shooting streaks but on repeatable effort and execution.
For Indiana, Game 6 at home offers a chance to close out the series. But the pressure now shifts slightly. Despite holding a series lead, the Pacers haven’t solved the Towns problem and are now facing a Knicks squad that has refocused defensively and seems to thrive under elimination circumstances. Haliburton’s health and engagement will be key, as will Nesmith’s availability.
For the Knicks, the margin for error remains razor-thin. Every possession counts. Foul trouble to Brunson or Towns could shift momentum instantly. Defensive lapses or rushed possessions can give Indiana the breathing room it needs to get back into a groove. Execution must remain sharp.
With the series heading back to Indianapolis, Game 6 will be a defining moment. New York’s chances rest on its ability to replicate the effort and tactics that defined Game 5. The formula is there—defend aggressively, dominate the glass, protect the ball, and let Brunson and Towns carry the offensive load.
The Knicks have shown they’re not ready to go home yet. Whether they can extend the series to a decisive Game 7 will depend on their consistency, discipline, and ability to adapt once again. The fight continues, and the pressure now belongs to both sides.
